Home › Guides › In-house vs outsourced
Fund factsheet outsourcing vs in-house production
Every month, fund managers and ETF issuers rebuild their factsheets with new prices, holdings and performance. Some do it in-house, some buy software, and some outsource it entirely. This guide compares the options on cost, control, accuracy and compliance, and lists the questions to ask any factsheet provider.
Last reviewed 17 October 2026 · About 6 minutes to read
1. What factsheet production involves
A monthly fund factsheet looks simple, but each one combines data from several sources and has to meet marketing rules. A typical month-end cycle is:
- Collect the data: NAVs and benchmark levels, holdings, sector and country weights, fund size and charges, usually from the fund administrator, index provider and internal teams.
- Calculate the figures: cumulative, annualised, calendar-year and discrete 12-month performance, risk statistics and yields.
- Lay out the document: charts, tables, commentary and disclaimers, in the firm's branding, for every fund and share class.
- Check it: against the source data, the KID and prospectus, and the marketing rules, such as five years of complete 12-month performance periods in the UK and clear past-performance warnings.
- Approve and publish: compliance sign-off, then the website, platforms and distributors.
The work multiplies with every fund, share class and language, and most of it has to happen in the few days after month-end.
2. The three ways to produce factsheets
In-house, built by hand
A marketing or product team updates last month's document in a design or office tool, pasting in new figures. It needs no new suppliers and gives full control, but it is slow, depends on a few people, and is where copy-and-paste errors creep in: a stale figure, weights that no longer add to 100%, or a risk indicator that no longer matches an updated KID.
In-house, with document software
The firm licenses a document automation platform and runs it internally. This suits large ranges and firms with technical staff, but it involves set-up projects, licence fees and internal ownership of templates, data feeds and checks.
Outsourced to a specialist
A provider takes the fund data each month and returns finished, checked factsheets. The firm keeps approval and control of content, while the provider handles the calculations, layout, checks and production. Providers range from large data and platform vendors to specialist services focused on factsheets.
3. Side-by-side comparison
| In-house by hand | In-house software | Outsourced specialist | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Set-up | None | Weeks to months; internal project | Days to weeks; template built for you |
| Monthly effort | High, at month-end | Medium: data feeds and checks to run | Low: supply data, review, approve |
| Error risk | Highest: manual re-keying | Lower, if checks are configured | Lower, if the provider calculates from source data and checks before release |
| Compliance checks | Manual review only | Depends on configuration | Should be built in: ask what is checked |
| Scaling to more funds or languages | Effort grows with every fund | Good once set up | Good: same data, more outputs |
| Cost | Staff time | Licence plus internal staff | Set-up fee plus monthly fee per fund |
| Control | Full | Full | Content and approval stay with you |
4. When each option makes sense
- By hand can work for one or two funds with simple layouts and a team that has time at month-end, provided someone independent checks every figure.
- In-house software suits large fund ranges with in-house technology and data teams, and firms that want everything on their own systems.
- Outsourcing suits boutiques, ETF issuers and growing ranges that want reliable, consistent factsheets without building a production team, and firms adding new share classes, languages or regulatory documents such as the UK's new CCI product summaries.
5. Ten questions to ask a factsheet provider
- Are figures calculated from our source data, or typed into the document?
- What is checked before a factsheet is released, and do we receive a record of the checks?
- Do you check the factsheet against our KID, KIID or EMT, for example the risk indicator, charges and holding period?
- How do you make sure performance is shown as the rules require, such as complete 12-month periods and the past-performance warning?
- Can the template use our own branding, fonts and disclaimers?
- How quickly after month-end are factsheets delivered?
- Are the PDFs accessible to screen-reader users (PDF/UA)?
- Can platforms and distributors read the figures as data, not only as a PDF?
- How is our data stored and secured, and for how long are documents kept?
- What does it cost per fund, and what is included in the set-up fee?
6. Common questions
Do we lose control of content if we outsource?
No. The firm still supplies or approves the commentary, disclaimers and data, and signs off every factsheet before publication. The provider produces and checks the document.
Who is responsible for the factsheet if it is outsourced?
The firm marketing the fund remains responsible for its marketing communications and their approval. A good provider reduces the risk of errors and gives you the records to evidence your checks.
How long does it take to switch?
Usually a few weeks: agree the template and branding, map the data, run a parallel month, then go live.
Related
Sources
- FCA Handbook COBS 4.6: past, simulated past and future performance
- ESMA Guidelines on marketing communications under the Cross-Border Distribution of Funds Regulation
Important information
This guide is general information only, believed accurate as at 17 October 2026. It is not legal, regulatory or compliance advice. Check the current rules and take professional advice before relying on it. To the extent permitted by law, autoFactsheet accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this guide; see our Terms and Disclaimer.
See what outsourcing would look like for your fund
Send us one fund and we will produce a free sample factsheet from its data, with the run report showing every check.